Marcia Lucas Explains How Disney Ruined Star Wars’ Legacy

Marcia Lucas, the editor who helped shape the original Star Wars trilogy and was creator George Lucas’ first wife, reently delivered a clear warning about how Disney has handled the franchise, contrasting the recent films with the success of The Mandalorian. Her comments put the growing divide between the corporate direction of Star Wars and the kind of storytelling that first made it a cultural phenomenon in high relief.

Lucas explains that she is not happy with the Star Wars movies made under Disney, but she strongly supports The Mandalorian, which she describes as a good show that understands story and character. She singles out the relationship between the armored bounty hunter and Grogu (aka Baby Yoda) as the emotional core that drives the series forward, episode after episode, as they travel from planet to planet and face new challenges together. That bond, she argues, is what Star Wars is supposed to be about: a simple, focused story built on loyalty, affection, and a clear objective, not a cluttered spectacle.

In her view, the Disney sequel trilogy abandoned that approach and mishandled the legacy of the original characters. She questions why Han Solo had to be killed and why Luke Skywalker was allowed to fade away at the end of The Last Jedi instead of serving as a mentor figure like Obi Wan or Yoda for a new generation. To her, these choices did not serve the story or the fans who had followed these heroes for decades, but instead removed the emotional anchors that kept the saga grounded. It’s well known there was a lack of a unified plan for the sequels which turned out to bea major factor in audience fatigue and long term damage to the brand.

Lucas also criticizes the prequel trilogy, although less harshly than the sequels, focusing on how the films leaned on computer generated imagery at the expense of believable human relationships. She recalls leaving an early screening of The Phantom Menace in tears because she felt that George Lucas had chosen the wrong story to tell, focusing on Anakin’s early years instead of exploring younger versions of Luke, Leia, Han, or Obi Wan and the events that separated the Skywalker twins. She points to the awkward age gap between the child Anakin and Padmé, and to key scenes such as the farewell between Anakin and his mother, which she believes lacked the emotional close ups and pacing needed to show genuine heartbreak. In her mind, Star Wars should always show real people struggling with real choices, not just digital environments filled with effects.

The editor’s authority comes from more than personal opinion. During the original trilogy, Marcia Lucas fought to keep the Force and its mysticism at the center of the story when then hubby George Lucas doubted whether audiences would accept it. She also helped shape crucial story beats, such as the decision for Obi Wan to die and return as a spiritual guide, which gave the first film its moral weight. Today she praises The Mandalorian for respecting that mystical element with the character of Grogu, while still keeping Yoda’s species mysterious, as George Lucas always wanted.

The interview (via Voltar) also touches on how technology changed George Lucas’s own priorities. Marcia suggests that he became fascinated with digital tools and computer generated characters, which pulled focus away from actors and human drama. While the prequels still used many practical models, George clearly pushed visual effects as far as he could, which sometimes left the films feeling like “eye candy” instead of character driven stories. Lucas’s critique of those films is that the heart was missing, even when the world building was impressive.

Her comments also revive a long running controversy over how Disney treated George Lucas’s own ideas once it bought the franchise. According to information confirmed by Disney’s former CEO Bob Iger, Lucas provided sequel trilogy treatments that were purchased and then set aside, leaving him feeling betrayed when he realized the studio had no intention of using them. Lucas had already spoken to Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher about returning for his planned Episode VII, expecting that his story would guide the new films until Disney locked his material away and hired other writers instead. More recent reporting notes that this decision fits a broader pattern of pushing the Skywalker legacy aside in favor of a separate corporate vision for the brand.

For many long time fans, Marcia Lucas’s criticism matches their own concerns about Disney’s handling of Star Wars. She argues that the sequels did not respect the original characters, did not maintain story focus, and often replaced coherent arcs with shock moments and spectacle. Online, even sympathetic commentary about Disney’s current Star Wars slate now admits that years of inconsistent decisions, canceled projects, and underperforming spin offs have left the franchise struggling to find a clear direction, while only a few titles such as The Mandalorian consistently deliver for audiences. One recent analysis bluntly states that choices like hiding the real story of how the sequels were developed and reshaping projects after backlash have “damaged the franchise forever” by eroding trust.

Lucas’s praise for The Mandalorian shows what she believes still works. The series sends a stoic warrior and a small, vulnerable child from world to world on a simple mission, while building their relationship through actions rather than speeches. It features a wide variety of locations and adventures, recalling the ice, forest, and desert worlds of the original trilogy that George Lucas once said he wanted, instead of the repetition of familiar settings that later films often fell back on. Most of all, it keeps the stakes personal; viewers are meant to care whether the child is safe and whether the Mandalorian chooses honor over profit, not just who controls the next super weapon.

Fans and commentators who criticize the sequels or Disney’s creative leadership often face accusations of bad faith, “toxic fandom,” or prejudice rather than engagement with their arguments. Marcia Lucas, however, is unlikely to be dismissed so easily, given that she helped build the franchise in the first place and has never been shy about criticizing both the prequels and the sequels on artistic grounds. Her comments reinforce the idea that you can reject Disney’s choices without rejecting diversity or new characters, as long as the storytelling remains strong and rooted in the core themes of Star Wars.

Let’s face it, the Star Wars franchise is at a crossroads. On one side stand the Disney sequels and several troubled projects, built around heavy effects, identity politics, and short term box office goals that have often stumbled with critics, audiences, and merchandise sales alike. On the other side stand works like (season one of) The Mandalorian, which lean on character, clear emotion, and the mystical tone that Marcia Lucas fought to preserve nearly fifty years ago. Her message is simple enough for any viewer to grasp: Star Wars works when the story comes first, when the heroes matter, and when the people in charge remember that they are stewards of a legacy, not owners free to tear it apart.

****